CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - General Discussion

Civil War History - General Discussion For Discussions on Civil War Era Personalities, Politics, Issues, Campaigns, Battles, and more. Serious Civil War Discussions Only Please! All other posts will be deleted.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 11-16-2005, 04:13 PM
Sergeant Major (1750+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,395
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MobileBoy
Porter,
Are you sure about that?I recall reading where Sherman declined to go to Andersonville because it would've delayed completing his other objectives and burdened him with thousands of extra men.Andersonville remained a prison until well after Atlanta so I think you must have gotten your dates confused.

IIRC, prisoners were moved to other locations and returned to Andersonville after the threat had passed. I'm going off memory for that.

Regards,
Cash
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-16-2005, 04:47 PM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 524
Default

I don't have the number with me right now, but there were some. The problem was that the rebs would not exchange black soldiers and in several cases either executed them on the spot or sent them into slavery. Some white officers of USCT regiments were executed as well.

Can you provide sources for the claims that some were sent into slavery or that white officers were executed? I would be interested to see some, since I've never come across them before...would be interesting to see the scope, etc.

Respectfully
__________________
Up men, and to your post! And let no man forget today that you are from old Virginia!

Last edited by nbforrest; 11-16-2005 at 07:08 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-16-2005, 05:44 PM
Corporal (250+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 379
Default

This is true. While Andersonville was the worst and Elmira was a close second, I don't believe it was deliberate. I agree with Bruce Catton that the horrible conditions in the POW camps on both sides was due to tragic human error.

Regards,
Cash

Cash, I have to disagree with you on this. Just look at what S.R. 97 says. I know this came up late in the war but by reading that you can see what the North’s mind set was. The North had a plenty to feed the prisoners but instead choose to starve them. “Read Elmira, Death Camp of The North”. Stanton issued orders to cut rations to the prisoners. If the South had won they would have hung a bunch of those prison Wardens and maybe Stanton too.

All though Sherman sent Stoneman to release the prisoners, I really believe Sherman didn’t care about them. They would just slow him down on his pillaging and burning. He had a plenty of troops to send to Andersonville to release the prisoners. After Macon why did he need a big army? There was no one to fight but old men and boys and Wheeler. Sherman had a one track mind. He wanted to march to the sea and then up through the Carolinas. Even when Grant ordered him to Petersburg when Sherman was at Savannah He talked Grant and Helleck into letting him go on through the Carolinas. He had to teach them a lesson for seceding. The war in the East would have been over sooner if he had went to Petersburg. He didn’t have to worry about Hood. Thomas took care of him. JMHO.


8thvacav
__________________
"I want to bury myself in a den of books. I want to saturate myself with the elements of which they are made and breathe their atmosphere until I am of it."
--Lew Wallace, 1885
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-16-2005, 07:07 PM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 524
Default

If I recall correctly, I don't think Sherman directly ordered Stoneman to proceed to Andersonville. I believe it was brought up at some point as a secondary objective. Sherman obviously didn't want the blame for the Macon/Sunshine Church fiasco, and it would appear that he did not intend for Andersonville to be the objective. It just wasn't feasible to set all those prisoners loose and expect them to make it back to the army.



Respectfully
__________________
Up men, and to your post! And let no man forget today that you are from old Virginia!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-16-2005, 07:24 PM
Admiral_Porter's Avatar
Corporal (250+ posts)
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 381
Default

Quote:
Just look at what S.R. 97 says. I know this came up late in the war but by reading that you can see what the North’s mind set was. The North had a plenty to feed the prisoners but instead choose to starve them
Southern civilians tried to bring food into Andersonville but Wirz refused. I don't see that as being any different.

"I am killing more men here than the armies in the field."

Quote:
I really believe Sherman didn’t care about them. They would just slow him down on his pillaging and burning.
Pure hyperbole.

Quote:
After Macon why did he need a big army? There was no one to fight but old men and boys and Wheeler.
What else should 60,000 men be doing? Twiddling their thumbs in the barracks?

Thomas was getting plenty of men from other departments.

Quote:
The war in the East would have been over sooner if he had went to Petersburg.
The war in the east could have ended any time Bob Lee wanted it to.
__________________
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-16-2005, 07:35 PM
samgrant's Avatar
Brig. General, Trivia Mod
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Land of Lincoln (and Grant)
Posts: 4,006
Default

Porter, What battle is that in your nice illustration?
__________________
-

"It was a very peculiar time." - Franklin D. Cossitt

Ancestors in USA Army: 6th IA Inf, 11th IL Cav, 1st AL Cav; 122nd NY Inf; 6th MI Cav; 35th MA Inf; 100th IL Inf; 1st CO Inf/Cav; 22nd IN Inf

Ancestors in CSA Army: 2nd TN Inf (Walker's), 9th TN Cav (Bennett's/Ward's); 2nd TX Inf
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 11-16-2005, 07:38 PM
Admiral_Porter's Avatar
Corporal (250+ posts)
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 381
Default

"Prairie Dog Town" aka Vicksburg.
__________________
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 11-16-2005, 07:56 PM
Corporal (250+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 379
Default

Quote:
What else should 60,000 men be doing? Twiddling their thumbs in the barracks?
Thats what I mean. There was no reason he couldn't send enough troops to release the Andersonville Prisoners.

Quote:
Southern civilians tried to bring food into Andersonville but Wirz refused. I don't see that as being any different.
Were did you come up with that. I read just the opposite.
8thvacav
__________________
"I want to bury myself in a den of books. I want to saturate myself with the elements of which they are made and breathe their atmosphere until I am of it."
--Lew Wallace, 1885
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 11-16-2005, 08:33 PM
Admiral_Porter's Avatar
Corporal (250+ posts)
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 381
Default

Quote:
Were did you come up with that. I read just the opposite.
That's what I read and the findings of the court said he intentionally withheld food.

Quote:
Thats what I mean. There was no reason he couldn't send enough troops to release the Andersonville Prisoners.
The only reason why you criticize Sherman is because you have a hatred of him. It's just another way to further your agenda.

Thousands of starving men would have been a burden to Sherman's army and guarding the prisoners tied down confederate troops. Maybe it wasn't the humane thing to do but I can understand his reasoning.
__________________
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 11-16-2005, 08:56 PM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 524
Default

That's what I read and the findings of the court said he intentionally withheld food.

Whoa now, are you talking about Wirz's military tribunal?
I wouldn't believe a dang word of it...it is universally recognized as a sham...hardly a reliable source of information.


Respectfully
__________________
Up men, and to your post! And let no man forget today that you are from old Virginia!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com. Site Version 4.3
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations