CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - General Discussion

Civil War History - General Discussion For Discussions on Civil War Era Personalities, Politics, Issues, Campaigns, Battles, and more. Serious Civil War Discussions Only Please! All other posts will be deleted.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #181  
Old 03-10-2008, 12:26 AM
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,463
Default

Mr. McQueen doesn't(in the section you quote), address any historical issues. He can't, so he resorts to impugning Levine's character, the last refuge of someone who has lost an argument.

People who want to believe that tens of thousands of black men, fought or "served"(a word used to blur, not clarify), the Confederacy, believe that very intensely. They hunt for evidence that can be interpreted, however implausibily, to support that belief, and ignore or denigrate the mountain of evidence to the contrary. They are not seeking to learn about or better understand an historical event. They are trying to invent something that didn't happen. Scientists study the stars, but they don't argue about Ptolemy anymore.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #182  
Old 03-10-2008, 03:21 AM
larry_cockerham's Avatar
1st Lt. (3500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Nashville
Posts: 3,980
Default

The question seems to continue to be about the exaggerated numbers of blacks claimed by various folks to have fought for the Confederacy. I seriously doubt many did so. A good number, small but good, did fight for the South and for survival. The 45 or so who rode with Nathan Bedford Forrest come to mind. They were a somewhat captive group at best, though they were exposed to the same gray bullets as the white folks in the Escort. Were they simply seeking freedom in totality, looking to defend their invaded homeland, or just figuring riding with Forrest was a comparatively safe place to be; we'll never know completely for sure. 1861-65 was a time when black folks had little political clout, I'd say roughly none, and were routinely treated as property or at best as friend who couldn't vote, come inside the bar for a shot of Jack Daniels (I know, he was just getting into business), or drink out of the main bucket. Some things have changed in the South, albeit very slowly.
__________________
Ancestors in US Army: 13th TN Cav; 10th TN Cav; 3rd NC Inf
Ancestors in CSA Army: 48th VA; 63rd VA, 5th NC Cav; 37th NC
Wife and Grandson's CSA: 15th AL, 51st GA, 41st TN; 36th TN; GA Mil 1197 Dist
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #183  
Old 03-10-2008, 09:57 AM
Battalion's Avatar
Sergeant Major (1750+ posts)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,928
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by matthew mckeon View Post
Mr. McQueen doesn't(in the section you quote), address any historical issues. He can't, so he resorts to impugning Levine's character, the last refuge of someone who has lost an argument.

People who want to believe that tens of thousands of black men, fought or "served"(a word used to blur, not clarify), the Confederacy, believe that very intensely. They hunt for evidence that can be interpreted, however implausibily, to support that belief, and ignore or denigrate the mountain of evidence to the contrary. They are not seeking to learn about or better understand an historical event. They are trying to invent something that didn't happen. Scientists study the stars, but they don't argue about Ptolemy anymore.
So you believe Mr. Levine is unbiased?

Do you believe he has all the facts on the issue?
__________________
POWER & MONEY

"Your New-York bankers and merchants are shrewd people, but I never gave them credit for so much sagacity as when they took the Government Loan. It was not merely patriotism, it was a high stroke of policy. It has saved the Government, and what they will regard as equally important, saved them from a great financial disaster."

New York Times, 27 September 1861

Last edited by Battalion; 03-10-2008 at 10:02 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #184  
Old 03-10-2008, 04:11 PM
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,463
Default

In my opinion, these are not the right questions. They don't engage the topic.

I think Levine describes the range of Confederate attitudes and actions towards large scale emancipation accurately. His description and conclusions are based on research and evidence. Attempts to discredit him personally, or others that present evidence or conclusions one disagrees with, is an admission that the evidence and conclusion themselves, can't be discredited.

No similar evidence exists to support tens of thousands of blacks fighting for the Confederacy.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #185  
Old 04-13-2008, 10:16 PM
Battalion's Avatar
Sergeant Major (1750+ posts)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,928
Default

Bruce Levine, "Black Confederates," North & South, Vol. 10, No. 2, p.41-

"...the entire history of the war demonstrates that the vast majority [my emphasis] of southern blacks wished for the success of the Union cause....Their personal loyalties and inclinations pointed [North]..."

False.

I've found too much information that points in the other direction.

*

Prisoner exchange after Battle of Antietam:

"...There were delivered at Aiken’s Landing of the Confederates 2,192 enlisted men, 82 officers and 19 contrabands all sent from Fort Delaware.
....
P. S.—The nineteen contrabands sent from Fort Delaware to Aiken’s Landing were represented by the officer in charge as having been taken on or near the battle-field and acting as teamsters. They insisted upon being sent." [my emphasis]

Ludlow to Thomas, 8 October 1862

War of the Rebellion, Official Records..., Series 2, Volume 4, p.606-607
http://cdl.library.cornell.edu/cgi-b...ames=1&view=50

*

No stockade?...No heavy guard?...What goes here?-
http://civilwartalk.com/forums/civil...html#post84779
__________________
POWER & MONEY

"Your New-York bankers and merchants are shrewd people, but I never gave them credit for so much sagacity as when they took the Government Loan. It was not merely patriotism, it was a high stroke of policy. It has saved the Government, and what they will regard as equally important, saved them from a great financial disaster."

New York Times, 27 September 1861

Last edited by Battalion; 04-14-2008 at 09:35 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #186  
Old 04-13-2008, 11:57 PM
johan_steele's Avatar
NCOIC, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South of the North 40
Posts: 4,078
Default

The problem is that your "scholarship" doesn't match w/ legitimate historians doing legitimate research with the actual records. You are too well known for by gosh and by golly research for my taste.

I'll stick with the legitimate historians thank you very much. Glaathar, Trudeau etc.
__________________
Few take the trouble to understand or to view the American scene with perspective. And we Americans love to find ourselves guilty of something. However, it is never I who am guilty, but those other Americans, the past or present government or the other political party. Americans almost never find other countries guilty. It is always ourselves or our fancied influence in other countries. Louis L'amour
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #187  
Old 04-14-2008, 01:20 AM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is online now
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,669
Default

Quote:
No stockade?...No heavy guard?...What goes here?-
I didn't see that source say yea or nay on any of it. Taylor doesn't mention chains either; nor overseers. Does that mean there weren't any?

The contrabands were working on fortifications near Mobile. In such works, there would be some soldiers present. And the contrabands would be detailed in small groups. There would be a need for no more than an armed overseer for each detail.

ole
__________________
I never knew a man who wished to be himself a slave. Consider if you know any good thing that no man desires for himself. A. Lincoln
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #188  
Old 04-14-2008, 02:50 AM
unionblue's Avatar
Captain (5000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 5,806
Default

Battalion,

You state above:

Quote:
"I have found too much information that points in the other direction."
The trouble is, Battlaion, WHERE have you found that information, and in WHAT context have you presented it?

Unionblue
__________________
"The American people and the Government at Washington may refuse to recognize it for a time but the inexorable logic of events will force it upon them in the end; that the war now being waged in this land is a war for and against slavery." Frederick Douglass

"Loyalty to our ancestors does not include loyalty to their mistakes." George Santayana
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #189  
Old 04-14-2008, 09:34 AM
Battalion's Avatar
Sergeant Major (1750+ posts)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,928
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Battalion View Post
Bruce Levine, North & South, Vol. 10, No. 2, p.41-

"...the entire history of the war demonstrates that the vast majority [my emphasis] of southern blacks wished for the success of the Union cause....Their personal loyalties and inclinations pointed [North]..."

False.

I've found too much information that points in the other direction.

*

Prisoner exchange after Battle of Antietam:

"...There were delivered at Aiken’s Landing of the Confederates 2,192 enlisted men, 82 officers and 19 contrabands all sent from Fort Delaware.
....
P. S.—The nineteen contrabands sent from Fort Delaware to Aiken’s Landing were represented by the officer in charge as having been taken on or near the battle-field and acting as teamsters. They insisted upon being sent." [my emphasis]

Ludlow to Thomas, 8 October 1862

War of the Rebellion, Official Records..., Series 2, Volume 4, p.606-607
http://cdl.library.cornell.edu/cgi-b...ames=1&view=50

*

No stockade?...No heavy guard?...What goes here?-
http://civilwartalk.com/forums/civil...html#post84779
...and not to forget the thousands of servants who remained with the army to the end of the war.
__________________
POWER & MONEY

"Your New-York bankers and merchants are shrewd people, but I never gave them credit for so much sagacity as when they took the Government Loan. It was not merely patriotism, it was a high stroke of policy. It has saved the Government, and what they will regard as equally important, saved them from a great financial disaster."

New York Times, 27 September 1861
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #190  
Old 04-14-2008, 10:16 AM
Battalion's Avatar
Sergeant Major (1750+ posts)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,928
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ole View Post
I didn't see that source say yea or nay on any of it. Taylor doesn't mention chains either; nor overseers. Does that mean there weren't any?

The contrabands were working on fortifications near Mobile. In such works, there would be some soldiers present. And the contrabands would be detailed in small groups. There would be a need for no more than an armed overseer for each detail.

ole
Never seen a POW roll with an absent without leave category.
__________________
POWER & MONEY

"Your New-York bankers and merchants are shrewd people, but I never gave them credit for so much sagacity as when they took the Government Loan. It was not merely patriotism, it was a high stroke of policy. It has saved the Government, and what they will regard as equally important, saved them from a great financial disaster."

New York Times, 27 September 1861
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com. Site Version 4.3
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations