CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - General Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Chat Calendar Mark Forums Read

Civil War History - General Discussion For Discussions on Civil War Era Personalities, Politics, Issues, Campaigns, Battles, and more. Serious Civil War Discussions Only Please! All other posts will be deleted.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91  
Old 02-07-2008, 10:02 PM
Freddy's Avatar
Corporal (250+ posts)
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Worcester, MA
Posts: 372
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Battalion View Post
Likewise in the USCT were cooks, teamsters, musicians, hospital stewards, and many others in non-combat roles and they are counted as soldiers.

They are included in that oft quoted number- 180,000.
Actually, no, the 180,000 African American combat troop figure is correct, which by the way included both USCT and state volunteers. Another 120,000 were employed in logistics support. See Forged in Battle:The Civil War Alliances of Black Soldiers and White Officers by Joseph T. Glatthaar
__________________
"Those who forget to remember the past are condemned to repeat it", George Santayana.

Last edited by Freddy : 02-07-2008 at 10:05 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 02-07-2008, 10:32 PM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is online now
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,529
Default

Thanks, Freddy, for the clarification and a resource. I usually figure who was paid?

ole
__________________
I never knew a man who wished to be himself a slave. Consider if you know any good thing that no man desires for himself. A. Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 02-08-2008, 09:03 AM
Battalion's Avatar
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,715
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freddy View Post
Actually, no, the 180,000 African American combat troop figure is correct, which by the way included both USCT and state volunteers. Another 120,000 were employed in logistics support. See Forged in Battle:The Civil War Alliances of Black Soldiers and White Officers by Joseph T. Glatthaar
Enlisted men in non-combat roles are always included in the totals.

Just a few examples:

Bernard, Edward....Teamster....73rd USCT

Brooks, Samuel....Cook....89th USCT

Berkins, William....Musician....95th USCT

(All of these are included in the African American Civil War Memorial)

check for yourself-
http://www.civilwar.nps.gov/cwss/soldiers.cfm

~

Totals from the US War Dept. never indicate any exclusion of enlisted men in non-combat roles-

Total enlisted.....178,975
Officers..................7,122

http://cdl.library.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/moa/pageviewer?root=%2Fmoa%2Fwaro%2Fwaro0126%2F&tif=00 150.TIF&cite=http%3A%2F%2Fcdl.library.cornell.edu% 2Fcgi-bin%2Fmoa%2Fmoa-cgi%3Fnotisid%3DANU4519-0126&coll=moa&frames=1&view=50
__________________
POWER & MONEY

"Your New-York bankers and merchants are shrewd people, but I never gave them credit for so much sagacity as when they took the Government Loan. It was not merely patriotism, it was a high stroke of policy. It has saved the Government, and what they will regard as equally important, saved them from a great financial disaster."

New York Times, 27 September 1861

Last edited by Battalion : 02-08-2008 at 09:12 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 02-08-2008, 12:55 PM
timewalker's Avatar
Corporal (250+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Flower Mound, Texas
Posts: 490
Default

I think it depends on what he means by 120,000 for logistic support. I would agree that musicians, teamsters, etc. would be included in the 180,000 total. But what of those who were used but not mustered into service? "Contraband" picked up and used for digging entrenchments, etc. Would these be "mustered in" and thus counted? I honestly do not know. Although how you would ever know how many of these there were is beyond me.
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 02-08-2008, 03:15 PM
Battalion's Avatar
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,715
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by timewalker View Post
I think it depends on what he means by 120,000 for logistic support. I would agree that musicians, teamsters, etc. would be included in the 180,000 total. But what of those who were used but not mustered into service? "Contraband" picked up and used for digging entrenchments, etc. Would these be "mustered in" and thus counted? I honestly do not know. Although how you would ever know how many of these there were is beyond me.
Teamsters could be hired contrabands (civilians) but there were others who were actually enlisted in the army...official designation Wagoner-

Ex.:
Bibb, Emit 17th USCT Infantry
Enlisted as Wagoner 30 November 1863.

Other non-combat roles were also enlisted-

Ex.:
Atkinson, William 14th USCT Infantry
Enlisted as Musician 15 October 1863.

Jones, Henry C. 14th USCT Infantry
Enlisted as Under-Cook 15 January 1864.

Ancestry.com
__________________
POWER & MONEY

"Your New-York bankers and merchants are shrewd people, but I never gave them credit for so much sagacity as when they took the Government Loan. It was not merely patriotism, it was a high stroke of policy. It has saved the Government, and what they will regard as equally important, saved them from a great financial disaster."

New York Times, 27 September 1861
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 02-08-2008, 04:25 PM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is online now
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,529
Default

Note the word, "enlisted." And now we're talking USCT. What I'd like to see is the word, "enlisted," in the roll of black confederates.

ole
__________________
I never knew a man who wished to be himself a slave. Consider if you know any good thing that no man desires for himself. A. Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old 02-08-2008, 04:49 PM
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,362
Default

Are we trying to turn slaves into soldiers again? Perhaps a few dozen more posts about the Louisiana Native Guard are in order.
Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old 02-08-2008, 05:36 PM
Battalion's Avatar
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,715
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ole View Post
Note the word, "enlisted." And now we're talking USCT. What I'd like to see is the word, "enlisted," in the roll of black confederates.

ole
So you believe blacks in the Confederate army would have to be enlisted like the USCT to be considered soldiers?

A servant would not qualify?
__________________
POWER & MONEY

"Your New-York bankers and merchants are shrewd people, but I never gave them credit for so much sagacity as when they took the Government Loan. It was not merely patriotism, it was a high stroke of policy. It has saved the Government, and what they will regard as equally important, saved them from a great financial disaster."

New York Times, 27 September 1861
Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old 02-08-2008, 07:55 PM
Freddy's Avatar
Corporal (250+ posts)
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Worcester, MA
Posts: 372
Default

From Forged in Battle:... the troops enlisted mainly in state regiments and all but four; 5th MA, 54th MA, 55th MA, and 29th CT, kept their state designations, while the rest took on the USCT moniker.

About 20% of the 180,000 troops were Northern blacks.
__________________
"Those who forget to remember the past are condemned to repeat it", George Santayana.
Reply With Quote
  #100  
Old 02-08-2008, 08:15 PM
Sergeant Major (1750+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,395
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Battalion View Post
So you believe blacks in the Confederate army would have to be enlisted like the USCT to be considered soldiers?

A servant would not qualify?
A servant would not qualify. To be a soldier you have to be mustered in as a soldier, such as every one of the USCT were.

Regards,
Cash
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com.
Site Design Version 4.2. - Website powered by Subdreamer CMS
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations