CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - The Eastern Theater

Civil War History - The Eastern Theater Discuss any and all battles, movements, and events occuring in the Eastern Theater here! This includes any actions in tha area east of the Appalachian Mountains in the vicinity of the river capitals of Richmond and Washington D.C.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-07-2005, 03:22 PM
FSPowers's Avatar
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 546
Question Malvern Hill

Let's bounce this around the CW world. Why would Lee order a frontal attack at Malvern Hill instead of moving around the flank? Especially since the hill was bristling with artillery.

__________________
F. S. Powers

Union Ancersor: Pvt Arnuah Norton, 60th Ohio. (G-G-G Grandfather) Died at Salisbury NC, November 3, 1864

Confederate Ancestors: Captain Thomas A. Morrow, 29th Texas Cavalry (G-G-G- Uncle) and 2LT George W. Morrow, 31st Texas Cavalry (G-G-G Grandfather). Both survived the war

My blog: http://fspowerscw.blogspot.com

My Book; http://stores.lulu.com/store.php?fAcctID=1900736


Last edited by FSPowers; 09-12-2005 at 03:23 PM. Reason: Too addicted to spellchecker to visually check it myself
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-07-2005, 03:44 PM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is online now
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,802
Wink Malvern Hill

If my recollection hasn't totally failed, Lee couldn't flank. To his left, he would have been under Federal Naval Guns. To his right, I can only speculate that the terrain was a hindrance.

If you get some takers, I'll be happy to dive into a book or two and get a more definitive answer.
Ole
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-08-2005, 11:48 PM
gary's Avatar
Sergeant Major (1750+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,331
Default

Lee didn't realize the futlity of a frontal assault. Still didn't realize it at Pickett's Charge. Not that Lee was worse than any other general. Most didn't know either.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-09-2005, 12:41 PM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is online now
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,802
Default

Gary does not speak with forked tongue. Nearly all the early leaders were West Pointers who studied tactics according to St. Napoleon.

A question comes to mind: How many of the Yanks on Malvern Hill had rifled muskets? Given that they were McClellan's I'd assume that they'd be equipped with the newest, best, gear. But that early on, were there enough rifled muskets to go around?
Ole
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-09-2005, 01:45 PM
ewc ewc is offline
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: pittsburgh
Posts: 863
Default

By Malvern Hill, Lee was pretty frustrated with his inability to bring all his weight to bear on McClellan's army. He was making his plans on the fly, excellent plans, but staff work that early in the war, particularly for the Confederates, was rather poor. (Trained or schooled Confederate officers greatly preferred field commissions to staff.) Lee had McClellan on the run since the commencement of the Seven Days, but here was the Federal Army with no more room to run. If he could knock them off this hill, the army would be in complete disarray and plump for the picking. What's more, he considered their morale and particularly McClellan's shaky. They could be had. What's more, this was Lee's last chance to strike a telling blow. If he left them be on Malvern Hill, he loses all these advantages he had built up, and they are still too great a threat to Richmond. Everthing in Lee compelled him to make this attack. And he felt a reasonable degree of success was entailed.

What Lee didn't factor in was the professional quality of union leadership below McClellan, particularly Fitz John Porter who commanded here and the artillery. Or if he had, he still felt his advantages too pressing to give up. Though it ended poorly, it was still worth the chance.
__________________
'It is the soldier, not the reporter, who has given us freedom of the press. It is the soldier, not the poet, who has given us freedom of speech. It is the soldier, not the campus organizer, who has given us the freedom to demonstrate. It is the soldier, who salutes the flag, who serves beneath the flag, whose coffin is draped by the flag, who allows the protester to burn the flag'

-Father Dennis Edward O'Brien, USMC.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-10-2005, 02:40 AM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is online now
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,802
Default

Excellent observation, ewc, Lee had no choice. He had to give it his best shot. I wonder if there is a parallel here with Grant's Cold Harbor disaster.
Ole
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-10-2005, 10:01 PM
ewc ewc is offline
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: pittsburgh
Posts: 863
Default

Thank you, ole. And excellent point there yourself.
__________________
'It is the soldier, not the reporter, who has given us freedom of the press. It is the soldier, not the poet, who has given us freedom of speech. It is the soldier, not the campus organizer, who has given us the freedom to demonstrate. It is the soldier, who salutes the flag, who serves beneath the flag, whose coffin is draped by the flag, who allows the protester to burn the flag'

-Father Dennis Edward O'Brien, USMC.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-19-2005, 02:57 PM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 524
Default

Lee did try to flank the Union line, in a limited sense. He sent troops around the Unin left but they were generally limited by Malvern Cliffs. And people tend to forget the fight on the Union right. A lot of the fighting was an infantry fight on the Union right. A confused messy affair, but Lee did not solely throw his men into the Union guns at the center. This fighting gets overshadowed by the more dramatic slaughter by the Union guns, but it created the surprisingly high Union losses.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-19-2005, 03:17 PM
JohnW in E.TN's Avatar
Corporal (250+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: upper E. Tennessee
Posts: 390
Default

There are some sharp minds and excellent writers on this forum, but I tell you, when EWC explains something, it becomes crystal clear in my mind, and I can almost see the events playing out. Always excellent analysis.

Regards,

John W.
__________________
Ancestors in CSA Army: 51st VA, 54th VA, 45th VA, 50th VA, 24th VA

Ancestors in CSA Cav: 21st VA, 25th VA
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-19-2005, 04:48 PM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is online now
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,802
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by nbforrest
Lee did try to flank the Union line, in a limited sense. He sent troops around the Unin left but they were generally limited by Malvern Cliffs. And people tend to forget the fight on the Union right. A lot of the fighting was an infantry fight on the Union right. A confused messy affair, but Lee did not solely throw his men into the Union guns at the center. This fighting gets overshadowed by the more dramatic slaughter by the Union guns, but it created the surprisingly high Union losses.
Trying to sneak in the back door? Welcome aboard. You will find us addictive, but may I suggest that you announce yourself in the "new members" thread? We all read that one and are genuinely interested in each and every entrant.

No comment on your post. I last got into the Penninsula more than 10 years ago and have nothing fresh to offer on that subject. Some may posit that Malvern Hill was Lee's first boner in the WBTS. At least one other esteemed contributor advanced the reasonable idea that he had no choice but to try. I'll buy any of that. General Hindsight is always right.
Ole
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com. Site Version 4.3
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations