CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > The Ballot Box

The Ballot Box Post and participate in polls about your favorite Civil War topics in this forum.

View Poll Results: Was Hood recklessly aggresive during 1864 TN campaign?
Yes (Hood's plan is terrible) 10 100.00%
No (Hood's plan is sound) 1 10.00%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 10. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-19-2007, 11:13 AM
cw1865's Avatar
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Riverdale, NJ (Morris County)
Posts: 1,145
Default Hood's TN Campaign

We're discussing Hood's TN campaign in 1864. The question is whether Hood's management of the campaign can be described as 'recklessly aggressive'
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-19-2007, 11:28 AM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is offline
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,282
Default

Much to complex a subject, CW, to be reduced to a yes or a no. I abstain.

ole
__________________
I never knew a man who wished to be himself a slave. Consider if you know any good thing that no man desires for himself. A. Lincoln
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-19-2007, 11:31 AM
cw1865's Avatar
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Riverdale, NJ (Morris County)
Posts: 1,145
Default Not scientific

Not a scientific poll, ole, just have some fun with it. Perhaps it will get new blood into the posting below.....
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-19-2007, 04:57 PM
Dred's Avatar
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 560
Default

Can anybody recommend a good book on this? My supply of literature on the Western campaigns in very inadequate.. like 0 Living in VA it was much easier to study about that being able to go to the battlegrounds and such. With all these TN posts lately I think its time for me to bone up on it a bit... long past time more likely
__________________
"In mortal combat, a man may and will become so infuriated by the din and dangers of a bloody fight that his heart will turn to stone and his every de sire [be] for blood."

John Hadley, 7th Indiana after the battle at Port Republic
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-19-2007, 05:58 PM
larry_cockerham's Avatar
1st Lt. (3500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Nashville
Posts: 3,863
Default

One of the better researched and better documented books is:

for CAUSE for COUNTRY
A Study of the Affair at Spring Hill and the Battle of Franklin

Eric A. Jacobson and Richard A. Rupp

O'More Publishing
423 South Margin Street
Franklin, TN 37064

2006
__________________
Ancestors in US Army: 13th TN Cav; 10th TN Cav; 3rd NC Inf
Ancestors in CSA Army: 48th VA; 63rd VA, 5th NC Cav; 37th NC
Wife and Grandson's CSA: 15th AL, 51st GA, 41st TN; 36th TN; GA Mil 1197 Dist
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-19-2007, 07:07 PM
Dred's Avatar
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 560
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by larry_cockerham
One of the better researched and better documented books is:

for CAUSE for COUNTRY
A Study of the Affair at Spring Hill and the Battle of Franklin

Eric A. Jacobson and Richard A. Rupp

O'More Publishing
423 South Margin Street
Franklin, TN 37064

2006
Eric Jacobson.. as in the Eric Jacobson that posts on this sight??
__________________
"In mortal combat, a man may and will become so infuriated by the din and dangers of a bloody fight that his heart will turn to stone and his every de sire [be] for blood."

John Hadley, 7th Indiana after the battle at Port Republic
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-19-2007, 09:33 PM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is offline
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,282
Default

The same, Dred. It has the advantage of being one of the newest books out on the subject. Wiley Sword, Embrace an Angry Wind, and James Lee McDonough/Thomas L. Connelly, Five Tragic Hours, were the trade standards until Eric's book.

ole
__________________
I never knew a man who wished to be himself a slave. Consider if you know any good thing that no man desires for himself. A. Lincoln
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-19-2007, 10:21 PM
Ozark Iron John's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Osage Beach, Missouri
Posts: 451
Default

I'm not a big Hood fan.

He was a fearless leader. A warrior in the truest sense of the term. American Knight Errant!

But military strategist ....... No.

"Get 'em up, John! Take 'em in there and push 'em." ... and he did, too.

Lost Two Limbs doin' it.

He should never have been put in command of the Army of Tennessee. NEVER! He was a Lumberjack, Not a Carpenter.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-20-2007, 07:12 AM
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,012
Default The Mark of Insanity

By the time Hood invaded Tennessee, the war was strategically over.

Bercause he went to Tennessee, Hood left Georgia undefended. His losses and retreat from Atlanta, allowed Sherman's army to sever the Army of Northern Virginia from much needed supplies in Alabama. It allowed Sherman to further destroy rails east of Atlanta, cutting Virginia off from the supply depot in Macon and increase the total unlikelyhood that Alabama supplies could ever get to Lee.

Hood conducted a campaign, a winter campaign, without the essential supplies needed by an offensive army.
He made a disasterous attack at Franklin, and attempted to make in all folly, a seige of Nashville.

When Hood's army cracked at Nashville, an army was lost with most of its artillery, never to be replaced. Hood's failed offensive meant a shorter war, and an earlier demise of Lee's army and the Confederacy.

Late in the war, General Joe E. Johnson wrote of a court of inquiry, about Hood's actions in Tennessee. The war was nearing its end. Hood would never get a very public analysis.

It would be an heirloom passed to the believers of the lost cause. The forgotten, disasterous winter war in Tennessee - Hood's War.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-20-2007, 08:55 AM
larry_cockerham's Avatar
1st Lt. (3500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Nashville
Posts: 3,863
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozark Iron John
I'm not a big Hood fan.

He was a fearless leader. A warrior in the truest sense of the term. American Knight Errant!

But military strategist ....... No.

"Get 'em up, John! Take 'em in there and push 'em." ... and he did, too.

Lost Two Limbs doin' it.

He should never have been put in command of the Army of Tennessee. NEVER! He was a Lumberjack, Not a Carpenter.
Actually he was a medical doctor's son and a socialite. The social part had a lot to do with his blessing by Jeff Davis. Yes, he sent lots of folks into battle without a bunch of thought or workable strategy.
__________________
Ancestors in US Army: 13th TN Cav; 10th TN Cav; 3rd NC Inf
Ancestors in CSA Army: 48th VA; 63rd VA, 5th NC Cav; 37th NC
Wife and Grandson's CSA: 15th AL, 51st GA, 41st TN; 36th TN; GA Mil 1197 Dist
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com. Site Version 4.3
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations