CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > The Ballot Box

The Ballot Box Post and participate in polls about your favorite Civil War topics in this forum.

View Poll Results: USN or CSN?
United States Navy 7 70.00%
Confederate States Navy 3 30.00%
Voters: 10. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-07-2006, 11:11 AM
Battalion's Avatar
Sergeant Major (1750+ posts)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,877
Default Who Did More To Hinder The New England/New York Slave Trade During 1861-1865

via Africa........

...then to Cuba, West Indies, Brazil.......
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-09-2006, 10:33 AM
gary's Avatar
2nd Lt. (2500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,507
Default To hinder slave trading altogether...

Me thinks the USN by its blockade of the Confederacy did more. The blue water Confederate naval presence was mainly through ships built overseas and manned by foreign sailors or merchantmen with letters of marque to act as privateers. Either way, their purpose was to disrupt Yankee shipping. The USN, on the other hand, served to pursue and destroy Confederate raiders or merchantmen with cargo (including human) that as destined for the Confederacy.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-09-2006, 04:27 PM
Battalion's Avatar
Sergeant Major (1750+ posts)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,877
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gary
Me thinks the USN by its blockade of the Confederacy did more. The blue water Confederate naval presence was mainly through ships built overseas and manned by foreign sailors or merchantmen with letters of marque to act as privateers. Either way, their purpose was to disrupt Yankee shipping.
Yes, you almost got it.....


Quote:
Originally Posted by gary
The USN, on the other hand, served to pursue and destroy Confederate raiders or merchantmen with cargo (including human) that as destined for the Confederacy.
"..(including human).."

Please give us a source for this.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-02-2006, 10:34 AM
johan_steele's Avatar
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South of the North 40
Posts: 3,980
Default

Any evidenec that the CS Navy ever stopped a slaver headed to New York? Doubt it greatly.
__________________
Few take the trouble to understand or to view the American scene with perspective. And we Americans love to find ourselves guilty of something. However, it is never I who am guilty, but those other Americans, the past or present government or the other political party. Americans almost never find other countries guilty. It is always ourselves or our fancied influence in other countries. Louis L'amour
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-02-2006, 11:21 AM
unionblue's Avatar
Captain (5000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 5,715
Default

Battalion,

You mean to say that some in the South was STILL trying to import slaves via New England shippers even during the war? With both the United States and the South declaring it illegal to import slaves?

Now that's determination!

Sincerely,
Unionblue
PS Battalion who was the first slaver to be hung for violating the law on importing slaves into the country? Hint, it wasn't on a Union/Northern/New England ship.
__________________
"The American people and the Government at Washington may refuse to recognize it for a time but the inexorable logic of events will force it upon them in the end; that the war now being waged in this land is a war for and against slavery." Frederick Douglass

"Loyalty to our ancestors does not include loyalty to their mistakes." George Santayana

Last edited by unionblue; 12-02-2006 at 11:29 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-02-2006, 12:47 PM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is offline
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,285
Default

The slave trade was officially ended in 1808. It then went underground and such as were imported were smuggled in, usually by way of Spanish posessions in the Caribbean. Profits were good and the trade, though reduced to a trickle, went on. When the US and British Navy got serious and started to hang a few traders, a serious crimp appeared -- profits weren't that good.

Battalion is using his usual transparent guile to claim that Slaves were brought to these shores on Northern-owned ships. Of course, the purchaser had no part in the evil transaction, nor does it enter into the subject that there were virtually no Southern-owned ships.
__________________
I never knew a man who wished to be himself a slave. Consider if you know any good thing that no man desires for himself. A. Lincoln
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-02-2006, 03:59 PM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 589
Default

http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?hlaw:12:./temp/~ammem_csT6::
"The execution of the laws for the suppression of the African slave trade has been confided to the Department of the Interior. It is a subject of gratulation that the efforts which have been made for the suppression of this inhuman traffic have been recently attended with unusual success. Five vessels being fitted out for the slave trade have been seized and condemned. Two mates of vessels engaged in the trade, and one person in equipping a vessel as a slaver, have been convicted and subjected to the penalty of fine and imprisonment, and one captain, taken with a cargo of Africans on board his vessel, has been convicted of the highest grade of offence under our laws, the punishment of which is death."

ABRAHAM LINCOLN.
Washington, December 3, 1861.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-02-2006, 09:33 PM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ill.
Posts: 523
Default Slavers registery

Quote:
Originally Posted by cedarstripper
http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?hlaw:12:./temp/~ammem_csT6::
". Five vessels being fitted out for the slave trade have been seized and condemned. Two mates of vessels engaged in the trade, and one person in equipping a vessel as a slaver, have been convicted and subjected to the penalty of fine and imprisonment, and one captain, taken with a cargo of Africans on board his vessel, has been convicted of the highest grade of offence under our laws, the punishment of which is death."
ABRAHAM LINCOLN. Washington, December 3, 1861.
The Quote is from Lincoln's Annual Message to Congress.
Any idea of Where the 5 vessels being outfitted were captured? (And where were they all registered? Rented, Leased? I do have the names of all 5 but not where registered.)
How about the cargo of Africans? Reason I ask, England and the US were both engaged in trying to stop slavers along the coast of Africa, and, although weren't all that sucessful in stopping many vessels, occasionally they lucked out.
Chuck
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-03-2006, 12:54 AM
unionblue's Avatar
Captain (5000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 5,715
Default

Ceaderstripper,

Your link does not work.

Sincerely,
Unionblue
__________________
"The American people and the Government at Washington may refuse to recognize it for a time but the inexorable logic of events will force it upon them in the end; that the war now being waged in this land is a war for and against slavery." Frederick Douglass

"Loyalty to our ancestors does not include loyalty to their mistakes." George Santayana
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-03-2006, 10:39 AM
samgrant's Avatar
Brig. General, Trivia Mod
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Land of Lincoln (and Grant)
Posts: 3,882
Default

try this one:

http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/...ib,fine,cwnyhs
__________________
-

"It was a very peculiar time." - Franklin D. Cossitt

Ancestors in USA Army: 6th IA Inf, 11th IL Cav, 1st AL Cav; 122nd NY Inf; 6th MI Cav; 35th MA Inf; 100th IL Inf; 1st CO Inf/Cav; 22nd IN Inf

Ancestors in CSA Army: 2nd TN Inf (Walker's), 9th TN Cav (Bennett's/Ward's); 2nd TX Inf
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com. Site Version 4.3
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations