CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > The Ballot Box

The Ballot Box Post and participate in polls about your favorite Civil War topics in this forum.

View Poll Results: Who is most responsible for the Civil War?
William Lowndes Yancey- foremost Southern fire-eater; 11 11.70%
John C Calhoun- d. 1850, SC nullifier & Southern rights; 13 13.83%
Jefferson Davis- Calhoun disciple, Confederate president; 6 6.38%
Robert Barnwell Rhett- Charleston Mercury editor, shrill fire-eater; 6 6.38%
James Buchanan- waffling outgoing Democratic president; 12 12.77%
Abraham Lincoln- incoming Republican president; 40 42.55%
Stephen A Douglas- Kansas/Nebraska Act & popular sovereignty; 3 3.19%
John Brown- Pottawatamie Massacre, Harpers Ferry Raid; 20 21.28%
William Lloyd Garrison- The Liberator editor, fierce abolitionist; 6 6.38%
William Henry Seward- irrepresible conflict, Lincoln's secretary of state. 2 2.13%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 94. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 12-16-2005, 08:20 AM
Wild_Rose's Avatar
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 526
Default

Yes, I stand corrected. Thank you.
__________________
"Forgive your enemies, but never forget their names".--J.F.K.

The War Between the States established... This principle that the Federal Government is, through its courts, this final judge of its own powers.
-- Woodrow Wilson
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 04-10-2006, 04:38 PM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 984
Default Responsible for slavery?

The Slave Oligarchy, upon whose continued wealth, slavery depended. Preservation of slavery was always intended as a right by the secessionists.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 04-11-2006, 09:08 PM
samgrant's Avatar
Brig. General, Trivia Mod
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Land of Lincoln (and Grant)
Posts: 3,852
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ewc
*Sigh* Then why participate??



Is it too much to ask to read the first couple of posts, especially the first outlining the poll? This is a multiple choice poll, choose three. And you are not just choosing men, but what they did and stood for. A handy summary accompanies each choice. Regards, ed
As this thresd has been rejuvinated, I'll stand by my original post #47
__________________
-

"It was a very peculiar time." - Franklin D. Cossitt

Ancestors in USA Army: 6th IA Inf, 11th IL Cav, 1st AL Cav; 122nd NY Inf; 6th MI Cav; 35th MA Inf; 100th IL Inf; 1st CO Inf/Cav; 22nd IN Inf

Ancestors in CSA Army: 2nd TN Inf (Walker's), 9th TN Cav (Bennett's/Ward's); 2nd TX Inf
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 04-12-2006, 02:44 PM
ewc ewc is offline
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: pittsburgh
Posts: 863
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by samgrant
As this thresd has been rejuvinated, I'll stand by my original post #47
As you will, Sam. Then i will stand by those fellows at the bottom of your posts. ed
__________________
'It is the soldier, not the reporter, who has given us freedom of the press. It is the soldier, not the poet, who has given us freedom of speech. It is the soldier, not the campus organizer, who has given us the freedom to demonstrate. It is the soldier, who salutes the flag, who serves beneath the flag, whose coffin is draped by the flag, who allows the protester to burn the flag'

-Father Dennis Edward O'Brien, USMC.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 06-09-2006, 07:50 AM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 984
Default The Harsh Economic Reality of Slavery

The plain truth is the Southern states were tied too tightly, economically, to slavery. On the other hand, the South was never going to retain control of the Congress in the future. And once that happened a northern controlled Congress was not going to admit another slave state to the Union. Lincoln said prior to his election that he would tighten control of slavery in the territories. That would severely reduce the slave economy and while not banning slavery in the south, would reduce its worth anywhere outside the slave states.

Black Republicanism grew from the power that the federal government had in the U.S. Constitution, but hadn't fully exercised. Southerners did not want a powerful government exercising power over the states, especially power that affected slavery. Lincoln was going to use that power and that meant secession and war.

Lincoln knew railroads as a railroad lawyer. He knew the weaknesses of the Southern industrial base, and he knew the rest of the U.S. had a very distinct advantage. It is a credit to the Confederacy that they fought so long. But by 1863, the cracks in the Confederate mirror were showing. The Confederate leadership would fight for some two more years. But the Confederate mirror was cracked and would shatter into a thousand pieces.

A Slave economy would destroy the ability to win; the very thing the Southern states were fighting to preserve - the freedom to exercise the right to own slaves.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 02-14-2008, 01:23 PM
Nico_Davout's Avatar
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Poland, Warsaw
Posts: 131
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by unionblue View Post
I see Lincoln catching the blame because he stood up and made the hard choice.

And the right one.
He was right because he has won this war.

Of course I have voted on A.Lincoln, he started the war when he had called 75,000 volunteers against free and independent Southern states. How can one be more responsible?
__________________
Nico, Maréchal d'Empire

Last edited by Nico_Davout; 02-14-2008 at 01:26 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 02-14-2008, 02:14 PM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is offline
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,028
Default

Heads up, Nico, INCOMING!

Lincoln called up 75,000 volunteers after Fort Sumter was reduced -- not to invade the freedom loving slave states, but to defend Washington City from an attack most were certain was coming.

ole
__________________
I never knew a man who wished to be himself a slave. Consider if you know any good thing that no man desires for himself. A. Lincoln
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 02-14-2008, 02:23 PM
Nico_Davout's Avatar
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Poland, Warsaw
Posts: 131
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ole View Post
Heads up, Nico, INCOMING!

Lincoln called up 75,000 volunteers after Fort Sumter was reduced -- not to invade the freedom loving slave states, but to defend Washington City from an attack most were certain was coming.

ole
From declaration:

"(...)Now, therefore, I, ABRAHAM LINCOLN, President of the United States, in virtue of the power in me vested by the Constitution and the laws, have thought fit to call forth, and hereby do call forth, the Militia of the several States of the Union, to the aggregate number of 75,000, in order to suppress said combinations, and to cause the laws to be duly executed.(...)

I deem it proper to say that the first service assigned to the force hereby called forth will probably be to repossess the forts, places, and property...."

I can`t find anything about defending Washington city? But I find a lot which is saying about invading, conquering, submitting Southern states.
__________________
Nico, Maréchal d'Empire
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 02-14-2008, 05:55 PM
5fish's Avatar
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,063
Default Voting

This poll surprised me a little. It is obvious the southern idealst voted more then once. "Poor Abe"

It was Davis who order the first to shot orders to our boys in Charleston, SC. The secession had started but it was Davis who lite the fuse to war

History gives him a pass for some reason. He should be revile like Kaiser in WWI and Hitler in WWII, but he escapes his duplicity in causing the war.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 02-14-2008, 07:18 PM
Nico_Davout's Avatar
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Poland, Warsaw
Posts: 131
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5fish View Post
It was Davis who order the first to shot orders to our boys in Charleston, SC. The secession had started but it was Davis who lite the fuse to war
True, but remember January 9, 1861 when the Star of the West was fired? No one said nothing. The same thing happens April 12, 1861. They say that South started the war. I disagree. South may gave 'casus belli', but nohting else. It was Lincoln, who by calling volunteers, declared (de facto) war.
__________________
Nico, Maréchal d'Empire
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com. Site Version 4.3
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations